The Day the Internet Went Dark: Why the AWS Outage is a Marketing Crisis

Source

On October 20th, 2025, disaster struck. Hundreds of apps and websites were knocked offline for over 12+ hours. Notable apps/websites include but are not limited to Canvas, GrubHub, Venmo, Spotify, and Amazon. The reason for this outage was due to Amazon Web Services (AWS), specifically an internal system failure in its "us-east-1" data center in Northern Virginia. While engineers worked around the clock to resolve this issue, many Chief Marketing Officers around the globe saw this as a failure, especially in regards to brand promise and customer experience.

The Fragility of the Digital Promise

When it comes to modern marketing strategy, consumers are promised uninterrupted access and a seamless customer journey when utilizing a company's app/website. When a user on Venmo is trying to send money or order through GrubHub, they are relying on the brand's promise of reliability. AWS is the backbone for a huge portion of the internet and when it failed, that promise towards consumers was broken. 

Source

The New York Times article makes it clear that the outage highlights how fragile the global technology infrastructure is based on companies over-reliance on the three main tech giants mainly Amazon, Microsoft, and Google. While the centralization of the infrastructure is good to maintain consistency and efficiency, it also creates a systemic risk as shown in the outage. When the customer experiences these inconveniences, they do not blame cloud provider. They blame the company whose app failed. When it comes to Brand Trust, that is the hidden cost of companies on depending so much on the cloud. They can spend years of marketing and building brand loyalty, but the fact that they failed to prepare for a third-party technical error shows how all that effort can be undone.

The Strategic Trade-Off

The article also states that this recurring problem showcases the dilemma between efficiency and resilience. Professor Rebecca Wright notes that smaller companies benefit from outsourcing their technological operations to AWS, all to enable market scalability and cost efficiency.

Other experts warn that relying on a single provider for a nation's or corporation's entire infrastructure is "exceedingly dangerous." This technological failure compels brands to make business continuity a core marketing value, so if this incident were to occur again, the business will remain partially operational to ensure resiliency. This instantly gives companies a competitive advantage as it shifts its marketing messages away from a promise to proof of reliability.

This outage also creates a marketing opportunity for competitors like Microsoft Azure. Seeing how many companies relied on AWS, Microsoft's strategy can focus on emphasizing stability and risk mitigation, asking these companies if their business continuity is worth spending on one vendor. The cost of the cloud requires continuous maintenance as the solution cannot lie in just technology but rather strategic diversification and proactive communication to reassure consumers that their services are not dependent on a single data center.

Source

Given that AWS outages are now a predictable systemic risk, how can major brands market and guarantee "trustworthy reliability" to their customers when their service is entirely dependent on third-party infrastructure?

Works Cited

Gross, Jenny. Amazon Outage Forces Hundreds of Websites Offline for Hours, 20 Oct. 2025, www.nytimes.com/2025/10/20/business/aws-down-internet-outage.html. Accessed 08 Dec. 2025.